So basicaly.. if you wanted to travel THROUGH time.. you have to move faster than time itself. Or slower?

To travel through time, you would need a vessel that has the ability to move faster than time. But.. you cant have speed with out time. You just cant. SO would it be easier to make a machine that moves faster than time? (bringing to question of how fast is time) or a machine that moves slower than time? (bringing to question of how slow is time)

I for one, would assume going slower to be an easier goal. Not only that, but if you assume time travel, how do you know if you’re going into the future or into the past? Would it make sence to move slower than time to move into the past? (or only stay in the past?) and moving faster than time to move you into the future?

What would you call a speed without time? 30 miles per hour… 30 just miles is a distance.. and 30 per hour is a time. Speed without time……

Anna.. have we found a use for our creation of the measurement of an Emphasis?

multiple emphasis.. is that an emphasi? or just a few emphasises? “I am moving at twenty emphasi..” Aka.. shall i just be moving 20 years into the future. OR “I am moving at negative twenty emphasi..” Im moving into the past.

Giving speed without a name a name, and creating sence of negative movement.

What have I done? Explained time travel. Its as simple as that.

For one to Travel through time.. they must learn to move without it.